Preprints

Hoogeveen, S., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berni = unas, R., Bulbulia, J. A., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., Georgescu, R., Haaf, J. M., Hagel, K., Kavanagh, C. M., Levy, N., McKay, R., Neely, A., Qiu, L., Rabelo, A., Ramsay, J. E., Ross, R. M., Turpin, H., … van Elk, M. (2023). Does she still love and feel hungry? Afterlife beliefs, mind-body dualism, and religion across 24 countries. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tvycp

2024

Holzmeister, F., Johannesson, M., Camerer, C. F., Chen, Y., Ho, T.-H., Hoogeveen, S., Huber, J., Imai, T., Jin, L., Kirchler, M., Ly, A., Mandl, B., Manfredi, D., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Sarafoglou, A., Schwaiger, R., Wagenmakers, E. –J., … Dreber, A. (2024). Replication by plebiscite: Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market. Nature Human Behaviour.

Hoogeveen, S., Borsboom, D., Kucharský, Š., Marsman, M., Molenaar, D., De Ron, J., Sekulovski, N., Visser, I., Van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2024). Prevalence, patterns and predictors of paranormal beliefs in The Netherlands: A several-analysts approach. Royal Society Open Science, 11(9), 240049. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240049

Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Van Den Bergh, D., Aczel, B., Albers, C. J., Althoff, T., Botvinik-Nezer, R., Busch, N., Cataldo, A. M., Devezer, B., Van Dongen, N. N. N., Dreber, A., Fried, E. I., Hoekstra, R., Hoffmann, S., Holzmeister, F., Huber, J., Huntington-Klein, N., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2024). Subjective evidence evaluation survey for multi-analyst studies. Royal Society Open Science, 11, 240125. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240125

2023

Hoogeveen, S., Berkhout, S. W., Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Haaf, J. M. (2023). Improving statistical analysis in team science: The case of a Bayesian multiverse of Many Labs 4. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3), 25152459231182318. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231182318

Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Many-Analysts Religion Project: Reflection and conclusion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 13(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070263

Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Aczel, B., Aditya, Y., Alayan, A. J., Allen, P. J., Altay, S., Alzahawi, S., Amir, Y., Anthony, F.-V., Appiah, O. K., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Balkaya-Ince, M., Balsamo, M., Banker, S., Bartoš, F., Becerra, M., Beffara, B., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 13(3), 237–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070255

Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Comparing analysis blinding with preregistration in the many-analysts religion project. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221128319

2022

Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Bulbulia, J. A., Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berni = unas, R., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., Georgescu, R., Gervais, W. M., Hagel, K., Kavanagh, C. M., Levy, N., Neely, A., Qiu, L., Rabelo, A., Ramsay, J. E., … van Elk, M. (2022). The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01273-8

2021

Hoogeveen, S., & Elk, M. van. (2021). Advancing the cognitive science of religion through replication and open science. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6(1-2), 158–190. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.39039

Pauw, L. S., Hoogeveen, S., Breitenstein, C. J., Meier, F., Rauch-Anderegg, V., Neysari, M., Martin, M., Bodenmann, G., & Milek, A. (2021). Spillover effects when taking turns in dyadic coping: How lingering negative affect and perceived partner responsiveness shape subsequent support provision. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H., III, Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E., Gordon, E., Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Dreber, A. A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Chapman, H., Gantman, A., Vanaman, M., DeMarree, K., Igou, E., Wylie, J., Storbeck, J., Andreychik, M. R., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060.

2020

Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Laypeople can predict which social-science studies will be replicated successfully. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920919667

Hoogeveen, S., Snoek, L., & van Elk, M. (2020). Religious belief and cognitive conflict sensitivity: A preregistered fMRI study. Cortex, 129, 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.011

2019

Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2019). Teaching good research practices: Protocol of a research master course. Psychology Learning & Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719858807

2018

Hoogeveen, S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Kay, A. C., & van Elk, M. (2018). Compensatory control and religious beliefs: A registered replication report across two countries. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 240–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2019.1684821

Hoogeveen, S., Schjoedt, U., & van Elk, M. (2018). Did I do that? Expectancy effects of brain stimulation on error-related negativity and sense of agency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01297