Publications

Preprints

Hoogeveen, S., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berniūnas, R., Bulbulia, J. A., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., Georgescu, R., Haaf, J. M., Hagel, K., Kavanagh, C. M., Levy, N., McKay, R., Neely, A., Qiu, L., Rabelo, A., Ramsay, J. E., Ross, R. M., Turpin, H., … van Elk, M. (2023). Does she still love and feel hungry? Afterlife beliefs, mind-body dualism, and religion across 24 countries. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tvycp

Hoogeveen, S., Borsboom, D., Kucharský, Š., Marsman, M., Molenaar, D., De Ron, J., Sekulovski, N., Visser, I., Van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2024). Prevalence, patterns, and predictors of paranormal beliefs in the Netherlands: A several-analysts approach \[Preprint\]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ajush

Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Van Den Bergh, D., Aczel, B., Albers, C. J., Althoff, T., Botvinik-Nezer, R., Busch, N., Cataldo, A. M., Devezer, B., Van Dongen, N. N. N., Dreber, A., Fried, E. I., Hoekstra, R., Hoffmann, S., Holzmeister, F., Huber, J., Huntington-Klein, N., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2024). Subjective evidence evaluation survey for multi-analyst studies \[Preprint\]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mxje3

2023

Hoogeveen, S., Berkhout, S. W., Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Haaf, J. M. (2023). Improving statistical analysis in team science: The case of a Bayesian multiverse of Many Labs 4. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3), 25152459231182318. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231182318

Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Many-Analysts Religion Project: Reflection and conclusion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 13(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070263

Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Aczel, B., Aditya, Y., Alayan, A. J., Allen, P. J., Altay, S., Alzahawi, S., Amir, Y., Anthony, F.-V., Appiah, O. K., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Balkaya-Ince, M., Balsamo, M., Banker, S., Bartoš, F., Becerra, M., Beffara, B., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 13(3), 237–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070255

Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Comparing analysis blinding with preregistration in the many-analysts religion project. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221128319

2022

Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Bulbulia, J. A., Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berniūnas, R., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., Georgescu, R., Gervais, W. M., Hagel, K., Kavanagh, C. M., Levy, N., Neely, A., Qiu, L., Rabelo, A., Ramsay, J. E., … van Elk, M. (2022). The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01273-8

van der Miesen, M. M., van der Lande, G. J. M., Hoogeveen, S., Schjoedt, U., & van Elk, M. (2022). The effect of source credibility on the evaluation of statements in a spiritual and scientific context: A registered report study. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2022.2041984

2021

Hoogeveen, S., & Elk, M. van. (2021). Advancing the cognitive science of religion through replication and open science. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6(1-2), 158–190. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.39039

Pauw, L. S., Hoogeveen, S., Breitenstein, C. J., Meier, F., Rauch-Anderegg, V., Neysari, M., Martin, M., Bodenmann, G., & Milek, A. (2021). Spillover effects when taking turns in dyadic coping: How lingering negative affect and perceived partner responsiveness shape subsequent support provision. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H., III, Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E., Gordon, E., Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Dreber, A. A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Chapman, H., Gantman, A., Vanaman, M., DeMarree, K., Igou, E., Wylie, J., Storbeck, J., Andreychik, M. R., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060.

2020

Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Laypeople can predict which social-science studies will be replicated successfully. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920919667

Hoogeveen, S., Snoek, L., & van Elk, M. (2020). Religious belief and cognitive conflict sensitivity: A preregistered fMRI study. Cortex, 129, 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.011

van Elk, M., Groenendijk, E., & Hoogeveen, S. (2020). Placebo brain stimulation affects subjective but not neurocognitive measures of error processing. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-020-00172-6

2019

Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2019). Teaching good research practices: Protocol of a research master course. Psychology Learning & Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719858807

2018

Hoogeveen, S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Kay, A. C., & van Elk, M. (2018). Compensatory control and religious beliefs: A registered replication report across two countries. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 240–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2019.1684821

Hoogeveen, S., Schjoedt, U., & van Elk, M. (2018). Did I do that? Expectancy effects of brain stimulation on error-related negativity and sense of agency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01297

publications preprints